DEVELOP REFINED AWARENESS OF THE SPECIFIC QUALITIES OF INNER VOICE AND BODY SENSATIONS THROUGH SYSTEMATIC ATTENTION TO SUBMODALITIES.
👐 NOTICING THE VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Course - is part of Series
The difference between an experience that empowers you and one that paralyzes you often lies not in the content but in the specific sensory qualities through which you encode it. When you notice that your inner critic speaks from above and behind in a harsh tone, you’ve discovered a lever for change more powerful than arguing with the content of its message. When you observe that anxiety lives as a tight ball of cold pressure in your solar plexus while confidence manifests as warm expansion in your chest, you’ve learned your body’s language with precision that allows for deliberate transformation. This course trains you to notice the fine distinctions called submodalities: the location, direction, speed, volume, pitch, temperature, texture, and movement patterns of your inner experience. These qualities are not random; they structure meaning itself, determining whether a memory empowers or haunts you, whether a voice guides or torments you, whether a sensation informs or overwhelms you. By learning to notice these distinctions with clarity, you gain the ability to consciously adjust them, transforming your experience from the inside out.
🎯 DURATION OF NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
🕥 1-2 hours per week, for 12 weeks
🎯 THE BENEFITS OF NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
“I spent three years in therapy talking about my anxiety. Then someone asked me where exactly is it and what temperature is it? Turns out it was a frozen tennis ball in my stomach. Who knew specificity mattered?” - Anonymous
The ability to notice the specific qualities of your inner experience creates possibilities for change that remain inaccessible when you relate to experience as undifferentiated wholes. When depression is just feeling bad, you have few options. When depression is seeing dark gray images off to the left, hearing a slow low voice from behind saying negative things, and feeling heavy coldness sinking down through your torso, you have multiple specific elements you can work with.
Precision in Self Understanding:
Most people describe their experience in vague terms: I feel anxious, I’m stressed, I can’t decide. Developing awareness of submodalities gives you a precise vocabulary for your internal states. You discover that your anxiety on Monday morning before work differs systematically from your anxiety before social events. The Monday anxiety is tight and cold, located in your upper chest, with a fast worried voice coming from your left side. The social anxiety is hot and pulsing, located in your belly, with a critical voice coming from above. This precision allows you to understand yourself more accurately and to develop specific responses to different states.
Enhanced Emotional Regulation:
Research in neuroscience shows that labeling emotions with specificity reduces their intensity and increases your capacity to regulate them. When you can notice that your anger manifests as heat rising from your belly into your throat, with a loud harsh voice speaking rapidly, and your jaw clenching, you gain early warning signs that allow intervention before the emotion fully activates. You can work with the specific elements: cool the heat, slow the voice, relax the jaw. This granular approach to emotional regulation proves more effective than trying to suppress or eliminate emotion as an undifferentiated whole.
Accelerated Change Work:
Traditional approaches to changing problematic patterns often require weeks or months of gradual work. Submodality based interventions can create rapid transformation by working directly with the structure of experience rather than its content. You don’t need to understand why you’re afraid of public speaking if you can discover that the fear is structured as seeing a large bright image of a judgmental audience very close to you while hearing a fast loud critical voice. By systematically adjusting these qualities, making the image smaller and dimmer and more distant, slowing and softening the voice, the fear response transforms without needing years of exposure therapy or analysis of childhood causes.
Improved Communication:
As you develop sensitivity to your own submodalities, you naturally become more attuned to others’ sensory language. When someone says I see things differently now, they’re revealing visual processing. When they say That resonates with me, they’re indicating auditory sensitivity. When they say I can’t grasp it, they’re expressing kinesthetic understanding. Matching someone’s sensory language and structure creates rapport and understanding that transcends words alone. You can help others clarify their experience by asking precise submodality questions that reveal structure they hadn’t consciously noticed.
Distinguishing Similar States:
Many internal states that seem identical actually have distinct submodality signatures. Excitement and anxiety both involve activation, but careful observation reveals differences: excitement typically produces upward movement and warming, while anxiety creates downward pulling and cooling. Confidence and arrogance both involve self assurance, but confidence feels centered and grounded while arrogance feels inflated and elevated. Learning to distinguish these subtle differences prevents you from confusing states and allows you to cultivate the ones you want while releasing the ones that don’t serve you.
Accessing Resources More Reliably:
When you know the specific submodality structure of a resourceful state, creativity, calm confidence, compassionate presence, you can deliberately recreate it. If you discover that your creativity arises when you see colorful moving images in peripheral vision while hearing soft background music and feeling lightness in your upper body, you can invoke these specific qualities to access the creative state reliably rather than waiting for inspiration to strike randomly. This transforms resources from mysterious gifts into skills you can practice and develop.
🏛️ ORIGINS OF NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY ACROSS CULTURES AND HISTORY
The practice of attending to the specific qualities of sensory experience has roots in multiple wisdom traditions, though the systematic mapping that NLP calls submodalities is a more recent development.
Contemplative Traditions:
Buddhist meditation practices, particularly those in the Theravada tradition, emphasize extremely detailed observation of sensory experience. The practice of body scanning, or sweeping, involves noticing the specific qualities of sensation: is it hot or cold, sharp or dull, moving or static, expanding or contracting? These distinctions aren’t just observed but recognized as constantly changing, demonstrating the fundamental impermanence that leads to insight. The Satipatthana Sutta, one of Buddhism’s foundational texts on mindfulness, provides detailed instructions for noticing the qualities of body sensations, feelings, mind states, and mental objects.
Tantric practices in both Buddhist and Hindu traditions work explicitly with inner sensory experience, visualizing deities in specific colors and locations, hearing mantras with particular rhythms and pitches, feeling energy moving through channels with distinct qualities. These aren’t arbitrary; each quality carries specific meaning and effects. The precision with which practitioners learn to generate and modify inner sensory experience demonstrates sophisticated understanding of what NLP would later call submodalities.
Western Phenomenology:
In Western philosophy, the phenomenological movement of the early 20th century emphasized careful description of subjective experience without interpretation. Edmund Husserl insisted on returning to the things themselves, meaning the direct experience before conceptual overlay. His student Maurice Merleau Ponty focused specifically on embodied perception, recognizing that all experience has specific sensory qualities that shape meaning. Their work provided philosophical ground for taking subjective experience seriously and describing it with precision.
Gestalt Therapy:
Fritz Perls, founder of Gestalt therapy, emphasized present moment awareness and sensory specificity. He would ask clients detailed questions about their experience: Where do you feel that? What does it look like? If that feeling had a voice, what would it say? These questions revealed the structure of experience in ways that talking about content alone could not. The empty chair technique, where clients would speak to an imagined person or part of themselves, naturally revealed submodalities: the imagined person had a location, a voice quality, a felt presence. Perls understood that working with these structural elements could shift experience more effectively than content based approaches alone.
Development of NLP Submodalities:
The systematic understanding of submodalities emerged in Neuro Linguistic Programming in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Richard Bandler, John Grinder, and their students were modeling therapeutic wizards like Virginia Satir and Milton Erickson, trying to understand the structure of what made these practitioners so effective. They noticed that successful interventions often involved subtle shifts in how clients represented their experience internally.
Bandler discovered that people coded different types of experience in systematically different submodalities. A memory you believe is different structurally from one you doubt. An imagined feared future is different from an imagined desired future. These differences weren’t random; they followed patterns. By mapping these patterns and then adjusting them, rapid change became possible.
Steve Andreas took this work further, developing the concept of submodality mapping where you would elicit the complete submodality structure of one state, then another, compare them systematically, and map across the differences. His work on self concept, timelines, and belief change all relied on precise submodality distinctions. He demonstrated that you could transform limiting beliefs into empowering ones, not by talking about them endlessly, but by changing their submodality structure to match the structure of things you already knew were true.
Modern Neuroscience:
Contemporary neuroscience validates the importance of sensory qualities in how experience is encoded and remembered. Different brain regions process different aspects of sensory experience: V4 handles color, V5 processes motion, different parts of the auditory cortex handle pitch versus location. The way experience is encoded across these multiple systems, with specific qualities in each dimension, matches precisely what NLP practitioners were describing through careful observation of subjective experience. The brain doesn’t store experience as conceptual wholes but as patterns of activation across sensory specific regions, and these patterns, these qualities, shape meaning profoundly.
📜 PRINCIPLES OF NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Principle 1: Structure Determines Meaning More Than Content
Two people can have identical life experiences and construct entirely different meanings based on how they encode those experiences sensorially. One person’s difficult childhood becomes fuel for resilience because they remember it as small distant images with lessons learned, while another person’s similar childhood becomes a prison because they remember it as large close overwhelming images with critical voices still speaking. The content is similar; the structure is different, and that structural difference creates vastly different impacts on current life.
Somatically, you can verify this by taking any memory and deliberately adjusting its qualities. Think of a mildly pleasant memory, then make the image smaller, dimmer, and move it further away. Notice how the pleasant feeling diminishes. Bring it closer, brighter, and larger, and the feeling intensifies. The content didn’t change; the structure did, and your emotional response followed the structure, not the content. This reveals a profound truth: you have more control over your experience than you realized.
Principle 2: Every Experience Has Specific Sensory Qualities
Nothing exists in your mind as a pure abstraction. When you think mother, you don’t access a concept; you access images, maybe her face or a scene from childhood, sounds, perhaps her voice saying something characteristic, feelings, the emotions and body sensations associated with her. Each of these sensory elements has specific qualities: the image has a location, size, brightness, clarity; the voice has a location, volume, pitch, speed; the feeling has a location, temperature, texture, movement. These aren’t optional embellishments but the very substance of your experience.
Learning to notice these qualities requires shifting from content focus to structure focus. Instead of asking What did my mother say? you ask Where does the voice come from, how fast does it speak, what tone does it have? This feels strange at first because most people aren’t trained to pay attention this way. But with practice, it becomes natural, revealing a whole dimension of your experience that was always present but unnoticed.
Principle 3: Critical Submodalities Have Disproportionate Impact
Not all submodality distinctions matter equally. In any given experience, certain qualities have a more powerful effect on meaning than others. For many people, distance is a critical submodality: experiences feel less intense when further away. For others, association versus dissociation makes the biggest difference: watching yourself from outside reduces emotional impact dramatically. Some people are most affected by brightness, others by size, others by voice location or tempo.
Discovering your critical submodalities is like finding the key that unlocks the door most easily. When you know that distance matters most for you, you can use it as your primary lever for change. Moving a traumatic memory further away might create more relief than making it black and white or smaller. The practical implication is profound: you don’t need to adjust every possible quality; find the ones that matter most and work with those.
Principle 4: Analog Submodalities Allow Continuous Adjustment
Submodalities fall into two categories: analog and digital. Analog submodalities vary continuously, like a dimmer switch. Brightness can be a little brighter or a lot brighter. Size can increase or decrease gradually. Distance can change smoothly from near to far. These analog qualities give you fine control over intensity of experience, allowing you to turn it up or down precisely as needed.
Somatically, analog submodalities correspond to gradual shifts in body sensation. As you make an image brighter, you might feel activation increasing incrementally in your body. As you slow a voice down, you might feel tension gradually releasing. The continuous nature of these adjustments means you can find the exact right degree of change, neither too much nor too little.
Principle 5: Digital Submodalities Create Qualitative Shifts
Digital submodalities are either or distinctions: associated or dissociated, moving or still, color or black and white. You can’t be partly associated; you’re either in the experience or watching it from outside. These digital shifts often create threshold effects, where the quality of experience changes fundamentally rather than just intensifying or diminishing.
The somatic experience of digital shifts is often more dramatic. When you shift from dissociated to associated in a memory, you might suddenly feel the emotions that were absent. When you shift from still image to movie, it might come alive in ways that intensify response dramatically. These threshold effects are powerful but require care; sometimes you want gradual adjustment before making a digital shift.
Principle 6: Submodalities Cluster and Interact
Changing one submodality often triggers shifts in others automatically. When you move an image closer, it might spontaneously become larger and brighter. When you slow a voice down, it might drop in pitch and become softer. These clusters reveal how your system organizes experience, how different qualities link together in your unique way of constructing meaning.
Discovering these interactions allows more efficient change work. If you find that distance is linked to brightness and size for you, changing distance might automatically adjust the others. This synergy means you can get more change with less effort by working with your system’s natural organization rather than forcing each quality separately.
Principle 7: Awareness of Quality Creates Choice
As long as experience seems like an undifferentiated whole, you’re stuck with it as it is. The moment you notice it has specific qualities, those qualities become adjustable. This shift from passive receiver to active adjuster of your own experience is transformative. You’re not at the mercy of your memories, emotions, or internal voices; you can work with their structure deliberately.
The felt sense of this principle is empowerment. When you discover that your anxiety has a specific structure, temperature, location, movement, texture, and that you can adjust these qualities, anxiety loses some of its grip. It’s still information, still something to pay attention to, but it’s no longer an overwhelming force beyond your control. This doesn’t mean you suppress or eliminate emotion; it means you relate to it with agency rather than helplessness.
🛠️ LEARN FROM YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE
“I used to think getting over something meant forgetting it. Turns out it just meant moving it from two inches in front of my face to about twenty feet behind me. Who knew geography applied to memories?” - Anonymous
Week 1-2: Visual Submodality Exploration
Choose a neutral memory, something mildly pleasant but not intensely emotional. Close your eyes and bring it to mind. Now systematically explore its visual qualities, noting each one:
Is it an image or a movie? If a movie, how fast does it move? Where is it located in space relative to your body? Point to where you see it. How far away is it? How large is it compared to life size? Is it in color or black and white? How bright is it? Is it clear and focused or blurry? Do you see it as if through your own eyes (associated) or watching yourself from outside (dissociated)?
Write down your findings. Now deliberately adjust each quality one at a time. Make the image larger, notice how you feel. Return it to original size. Make it brighter, notice the effect. Return it. Move it further away, closer, to different locations. Each time, notice what happens to your feeling about the memory. Which changes have the most impact? Those are likely your critical visual submodalities.
Week 3-4: Auditory Submodality Exploration
Think of your inner voice, the one that comments on your experience, plans, worries, or encourages. Notice its qualities:
Where does it originate? Inside your head, from a specific location outside, from above, behind, to the side? Whose voice is it? Yours, or someone else’s? How fast does it speak? What volume? What pitch, high or low? What tone, harsh, kind, neutral? Is it mono or does it seem to have directionality or surround quality?
Now experiment with adjustments. Move the voice to different locations. How does it feel when it speaks from your center versus from behind you? Change the speed, make it faster, slower. Change the volume, louder, softer. Change the pitch, higher, lower. Try changing whose voice it is. If it’s a critical voice, try saying the same words in a kind voice, or a silly cartoon voice. Notice how changing these qualities changes the impact of what the voice says.
Week 5-6: Kinesthetic Submodality Exploration
Bring to mind a body sensation you experience regularly, perhaps tension, relaxation, or a particular emotional feeling. Notice its qualities with precision:
Where exactly is it located? What size is it? What shape? What temperature, hot, cold, neutral? What texture, smooth, rough, sharp, soft? What weight, heavy, light? Is it moving or static? If moving, in what direction and at what speed? What’s its intensity on a scale of 1 to 10?
Now adjust these qualities systematically. If it’s hot, imagine cooling it. If it’s heavy, lighten it. If it’s moving in one direction, reverse it or stop it. If it’s large, shrink it. Notice how these adjustments affect your experience. You might discover that changing temperature affects emotional intensity, or that shifting location changes meaning, or that altering movement direction transforms a negative feeling into a positive one.
Week 7-8: Comparing Different States
Choose two different internal states that you experience regularly, perhaps confidence and doubt, or calm and anxiety. Access each state fully, then map its complete submodality structure in all three systems: visual, auditory, kinesthetic.
Create two columns in your journal. In the left column, write the submodality structure of the less resourceful state. In the right column, write the structure of the more resourceful state. Look for systematic differences. Does the confident state have images that are closer, brighter, more colorful? Does the voice speak from a different location, with different tone? Do the body sensations have different temperature, texture, movement?
These differences reveal how you structure meaning. The specific qualities that differ between these states are the ones you can adjust to shift from one state to another. This is the foundation of submodality mapping, one of NLP’s most powerful change techniques.
Week 9-10: Working with Inner Critic
Most people have an inner critical voice that comments negatively on their actions, appearance, or abilities. This week, study yours with precision. When you hear it, immediately notice:
Location: where does it come from? Volume: how loud? Pitch: high or low? Speed: fast or slow? Tone: what quality does the voice have? Words: what specifically does it say?
Now experiment with adjustments that typically reduce the impact of critical voices. Move it to a less powerful location, often down and to the side rather than above and behind. Slow it down significantly. Lower the volume. Change the pitch, try making it very high like a cartoon character. Try changing the voice to someone you respect but who would never actually criticize you that way. Try having it say the same words while laughing gently.
Most people discover that the critical voice loses its power when its submodalities change, even if the words stay the same. The meaning was carried more by the structure than the content.
Week 11-12: Building Desired States
Think of a state you’d like to experience more often: creativity, confidence, compassion, joy. Remember a time when you felt that way. Map its complete submodality structure. This becomes your template.
Now, throughout your week, when you notice yourself in a less resourceful state, deliberately adjust your current submodalities to match the template. If your resourceful state has bright colorful images out in front, and you’re currently seeing dark images down and to the left, shift them. If your resourceful state has a warm gentle voice in your center, and you’re currently hearing a harsh fast voice from above, change it.
This is installing a resourceful state deliberately. At first it requires conscious effort. With practice, it becomes more automatic. Your nervous system learns the submodality signature of states you want to cultivate and begins defaulting to those structures more naturally.
💪 MEDITATION FOR NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Setup:
Settle into a comfortable position where your spine can be relatively straight without strain. Allow your body to find its own balance between alertness and ease. You might let your eyes close naturally, or keep them open with a soft, downward gaze. As you begin to arrive here, notice the simple fact of breathing, the gentle movement of air in and out, without trying to control or perfect it.
Take a moment to simply acknowledge where you are, this body, this place, this moment. And as you continue breathing, you might begin to notice that there’s already more happening in your awareness than you usually attend to. Sounds from your environment, sensations in various parts of your body, perhaps some mental activity. All of this present, all of this available to your attention.
Core Practice:
Today we’re going to explore your inner experience with unusual precision, noticing the specific qualities that give structure to your thoughts, feelings, and sensations. And you can begin by bringing to mind something very simple, perhaps a pleasant memory from recent weeks. Not intensely emotional, just something that makes you smile a little when you think of it.
As this memory comes into awareness, I invite you to become curious about how you’re representing it. Notice if there’s a visual component, an image or perhaps a series of images. And if there is, you might begin to explore its qualities with gentle interest. Where is this image located in your awareness? You could even point to where you sense it, if that helps clarify. Is it in front of you, to one side, above, below? Allow yourself to notice.
And this image, is it large or small? Perhaps about life size, or maybe larger, or maybe quite small? There’s no right answer; you’re simply discovering how your mind has structured this particular memory. Is the image bright or dim? Colorful or more muted, perhaps even black and white? Is it clear and focused, or soft, maybe a bit fuzzy?
And as you continue exploring, you might notice whether you’re seeing this memory as if through your own eyes, associated into the experience, or whether you’re watching yourself from outside, dissociated. And is it still, like a photograph, or moving, like a movie? Each of these qualities is information about how you code experience.
Now shift your attention to any sounds or words connected with this memory. Perhaps there’s dialogue, or ambient sounds, or maybe a voice commenting. If there are sounds, notice where they seem to originate. Inside your head, from a specific location, from multiple directions? What’s the volume, loud enough to be clear, or quieter, maybe whisper soft? Is there a pitch to the voice, higher or lower?
And the speed, does the voice or sound move quickly, or slowly, or somewhere in between? Allow yourself to notice the tone quality. Is it warm, harsh, neutral, melodic? There’s no need to analyze why these qualities exist; simply let yourself become aware of them, bringing what’s usually unconscious into conscious recognition.
Now move your awareness into your body, noticing any sensations connected with this pleasant memory. Where in your body do you feel something? Perhaps your chest, your belly, your throat, your face? Allow your attention to rest there, noticing the specific qualities of this sensation.
What’s the temperature of this feeling? Warm, cool, neutral, or perhaps warm in some areas and cool in others? What size is it? Maybe the size of a coin, a baseball, filling a larger area? What shape, circular, rectangular, irregular? Does it have texture? Smooth, rough, soft, sharp?
And this sensation, is it moving or still? If it’s moving, notice the direction it moves. Up, down, spiraling, pulsing, flowing? What’s the speed of this movement? And the intensity, on a scale from 1 to 10, where would you place it?
As you continue noticing all these specific qualities, visual location and size and brightness, auditory location and volume and pitch and speed, kinesthetic location and temperature and texture and movement, you might begin to recognize that these aren’t random. These qualities are precisely how your nervous system codes meaning. This particular combination of submodalities is what makes this memory pleasant rather than neutral or unpleasant.
And I wonder what would happen if you began to adjust some of these qualities, just experimentally, just to discover what’s possible. Maybe you could make the image a bit brighter, and notice what happens to your feeling. Perhaps you could slow down any voice or sound, and allow yourself to sense how that shifts your experience.
You might try moving a body sensation, if it’s in one location, imagine it flowing to another location, and notice the effect. Or change its temperature, if it’s warm, cool it slightly, if it’s cool, warm it gently, and sense how temperature affects emotional quality.
The beauty of this awareness is that it reveals you’re not a passive receiver of experience but an active participant in its construction. By noticing the specific qualities, you gain access to adjustment, to choice, to the possibility of structuring your experience in ways that serve you better.
Integration:
As we begin to complete this exploration, take a moment to appreciate what you’ve discovered. Even if it seemed subtle, you’ve been training a capacity that most people never develop: the ability to notice the fine structure of your own experience. This skill, like any skill, strengthens with practice.
And you can carry this refined awareness into your daily life, noticing qualities that you previously overlooked. When an emotion arises, you might pause briefly to notice its location, temperature, movement. When your inner voice speaks, you could check where it originates, what tone it uses. This noticing alone often shifts experience, bringing what’s unconscious into consciousness where it can be worked with.
In your own time, at your own pace, begin to return your awareness to the external world. Notice sounds in your environment, the feeling of your body supported by what’s beneath you, the light beyond your eyelids if they’re closed. And when you feel ready, you can let your eyes open if they’ve been closed, returning fully to this moment, this place, carrying with you this enhanced capacity for precise inner awareness.
🗣️ ANECDOTE ABOUT NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Jennifer sat across from me, frustrated and exhausted. “I’ve tried everything,” she said. “Therapy, medication, meditation, exercise, positive affirmations. Nothing works. I still wake up every morning feeling this dread, and I still hear this voice telling me I’m not good enough.”
“Tell me about the voice,” I said. “Where is it?”
She looked confused. “What do you mean where? It’s in my head.”
“Show me. Point to where you hear it.”
Slowly, tentatively, she raised her hand and pointed behind and slightly above her left ear. Her eyes widened with surprise. “I never realized it was in a specific place. I just thought… it was everywhere.”
“Whose voice is it?”
“Mine. I think. No, wait.” She paused, listening inward. “Actually, it sounds like my mother. Oh my God. It sounds exactly like my mother.”
This is one of the most common discoveries people make when they start attending to submodalities with precision. The critical voice they’ve been battling for years, thinking it’s their own authentic judgment, turns out to be someone else’s voice internalized and replaying automatically.
“What else do you notice about the voice?” I asked. “How fast does it speak?”
“Fast. Rushed. Like it’s urgent, like I need to hear this right now or terrible things will happen.”
“And the volume?”
“Loud. Definitely loud. Sometimes it feels like it’s shouting even though I know objectively it’s not.”
“And the tone?”
“Harsh. Sharp. There’s no kindness in it at all.”
I wrote down these specifications: location behind and above left, mother’s voice, fast speed, loud volume, harsh tone. This was the submodality structure of her self criticism.
“Now tell me about the dread you feel in the morning,” I said. “Where in your body?”
She placed her hand on her upper chest and throat. “Here. It feels like something is sitting on my chest, pressing down.”
“What size?”
“Maybe… like a dinner plate? Heavy.”
“Temperature?”
“Cold. Definitely cold.”
“Texture?”
She thought for a moment. “Sharp? No, that’s not quite right. More like… rough. Like sandpaper or concrete.”
“Is it moving or still?”
“It’s pressing down. It has weight, pushing down into me.”
So now we had two structures: the harsh loud fast voice from behind and above, and the cold heavy rough sensation pressing down on her chest. Both had been there for years, and both had seemed immutable, just facts of her existence that she had to endure.
“I’d like to try something,” I said. “Just an experiment. Are you willing?”
She nodded, though she looked skeptical.
“First, let’s work with the voice. I want you to move it. Physically, in your imagination, pick it up from where it is behind and above your left ear, and move it down to your center, right in the middle of your chest.”
She closed her eyes, concentrating. After a moment, she gasped slightly. “It’s… different. It’s still saying the same words, but it doesn’t have the same impact.”
“Good. Now slow it way down. Make it speak at about half the speed it was.”
Again she focused, then relaxed visibly. “Oh. Wow. When it speaks slowly, I can actually think about whether what it’s saying is true. When it was fast, it just felt like fact.”
“Now turn the volume down. Make it softer, gentler.”
A slight smile crossed her face. “It’s almost silly now. Like it’s trying to be harsh but it just can’t quite manage it.”
“And now, the most important one: change whose voice it is. Make it your voice, but the you from your wisest, most compassionate self. The you who actually wants what’s best for you.”
This took longer. She sat quietly for almost two minutes. Then tears started flowing.
“What’s happening?” I asked gently.
“It’s saying the same words, but in my own kind voice, and they mean something completely different. You’re not good enough yet becomes You’re still growing, and that’s okay. It’s not criticism anymore. It’s… encouragement.”
This is the power of submodality work. The content hadn’t changed; the structure had, and that structural change transformed meaning entirely.
We then worked with the physical sensation. I had her experiment with changing its qualities. When she imagined warming it from cold to neutral, the oppressive quality diminished. When she changed the rough texture to smooth, it felt less hostile. When she transformed the downward pressure into upward expansion, something profound shifted.
“It’s almost gone,” she said with wonder. “I can barely feel it anymore. How is that possible? I’ve had this feeling every morning for five years.”
“Because you’ve been treating it as a solid unchangeable thing,” I explained. “But it’s not. It’s a structure, a pattern your nervous system creates by organizing specific sensory qualities in a specific way. Once you can perceive the structure, you can adjust it.”
I gave her homework: every morning when she noticed the dread, she was to immediately check its submodalities and adjust them. Check the voice’s location, speed, volume, tone; move and change them as needed. Check the sensation’s location, temperature, texture, movement; adjust those too.
She emailed me three weeks later. “I can’t believe I’m saying this, but the morning dread is gone. Completely gone. It tried to come back a few times, but as soon as I noticed it, I adjusted the qualities, and it dissolved. And the critical voice still speaks sometimes, but now it’s in my own kind voice in my center, and it actually helps me grow instead of keeping me stuck. I spent years in therapy talking about my mother and my childhood and my patterns, and none of it helped as much as twenty minutes of moving voices around and adjusting temperatures. Why didn’t anyone teach me this before?”
It’s a good question. We spend enormous amounts of time and energy trying to change what we think and feel without ever learning how we code those thoughts and feelings sensorially. We treat experience as undifferentiated wholes rather than structures built from specific qualities that can be observed, understood, and adjusted.
Six months later, Jennifer returned for a follow up session. She looked younger, lighter. “I use this all the time now,” she said. “Not just with the critical voice and morning dread, but with everything. When I feel anxious, I check the submodalities. Usually it’s a tight cold sensation moving rapidly in my solar plexus. So I slow it down, warm it up, let it expand, and the anxiety transforms into calm alertness. When I need confidence, I bring up a memory of a time I felt confident and check its structure: bright colorful images straight ahead, warm expansion in my chest. Then I make my current experience match that structure, and confidence arrives.”
She paused, then added, “I realize now that I was never broken. I just didn’t know how my own system worked. Once I learned the language, the controls, I could actually drive my own experience instead of being driven by it.”
That’s exactly right. The controls are the submodalities, the specific sensory qualities that structure meaning. Once you can notice them, you can adjust them. And that changes everything.
👣 THE BASIC PROCESS OF NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Step 1: Establish Baseline Awareness
Before you can notice specific qualities, you need to be able to notice experience at all. Spend several days simply observing when you hear inner voice or feel body sensations. Don’t try to analyze or change anything; just notice that something is happening. “I’m hearing a voice.” “I’m feeling something in my chest.”
The somatic checkpoint is recognizing that experience is occurring. Many people are so identified with their thoughts and feelings that they don’t realize these are objects of awareness rather than who they are. Creating this slight separation, this observer perspective, is foundational.
If you find it difficult to notice experience, start with the most obvious instances. Wait for a moment of clear emotion or a loud inner voice, then pause and acknowledge it. Build your observational muscle with these easier cases before moving to subtler experiences.
Step 2: Begin with Location
Location is often the easiest submodality to notice and one of the most powerful to work with. When you hear inner voice, immediately ask: Where is it? Point to the location if that helps. Above, behind, to the side, in your center, from outside?
When you feel a body sensation, ask the same question: Where exactly? Not just “in my chest” but “in the upper left part of my chest, slightly toward the surface.” The more specific your location awareness, the more precisely you can work with the experience.
Practice this with multiple experiences over several days. Notice if different types of voice come from different locations. Notice if different emotions have different body locations. Your critical voice might come from above and behind, while your encouraging voice comes from your center. Fear might be in your belly, while excitement is in your chest. These patterns are individual to you; discovering them is discovering your own system’s organization.
Common pitfall: saying “everywhere” or “nowhere” because location seems vague. With patience and practice, you can almost always locate experience somewhere. If it truly seems diffuse, that diffuseness itself is information about its structure.
Step 3: Add One Quality at a Time
Once you’re reliably noticing location, add one more quality to your awareness. For inner voice, try speed next. Is the voice speaking quickly, moderately, slowly? Don’t judge it; just notice. Practice noticing speed along with location for several days until both become automatic.
For body sensations, try temperature next. Is the sensation warm, cool, or neutral? Notice both location and temperature together until this becomes natural. Then add another quality, perhaps size for sensations or volume for voice.
The key is building your observation skills gradually. If you try to notice everything at once, it becomes overwhelming and you notice nothing clearly. Add one quality at a time, practice until it’s automatic, then add the next.
The somatic indicator of success is that noticing these qualities becomes effortless. At first it requires concentration; after practice, you automatically register location and temperature, or location and speed, without thinking about it.
Step 4: Complete Submodality Elicitation
Choose an experience to explore thoroughly. Bring it to mind and systematically check every submodality in all three systems. Use these questions as a guide:
Visual:
- Where is the image located?
- How far away?
- How large compared to life size?
- Color or black and white?
- Bright or dim?
- Clear or blurry?
- Still or moving?
- If moving, what speed?
- Associated (seeing through your eyes) or dissociated (watching yourself)?
- Framed or panoramic?
- 2D or 3D?
Auditory:
- Where does sound originate?
- Whose voice?
- What volume?
- What pitch?
- What speed?
- What tone quality?
- Mono or directional?
- Continuous or intermittent?
- What rhythm?
Kinesthetic:
- Where is sensation located?
- What size?
- What shape?
- What temperature?
- What texture?
- What weight?
- Moving or still?
- If moving, what direction and speed?
- What intensity (1-10)?
- On surface or deep inside?
Write down the complete structure. This detailed mapping reveals precisely how you code this particular experience.
Step 5: Contrast Two States
Choose two different states you experience regularly, one you want more of and one you want less of. Perhaps confidence versus doubt, or calm versus anxiety. Elicit the complete submodality structure of each using the questions from Step 4.
Create two columns and note the differences. This contrast mapping reveals how you distinguish between these states sensorially. The differences you find are the leverage points for change. If your confidence state has images that are closer, brighter, and more colorful than your doubt state, those are the qualities you can adjust to shift from doubt to confidence.
Watch for the critical submodalities, the differences that seem most significant. These vary between people. For some, distance matters most; for others, brightness or association/dissociation or voice location. Your critical submodalities are your most powerful change levers.
Step 6: Experiment with Single Adjustments
Choose one submodality from your mapping and deliberately adjust it while keeping everything else constant. If an unpleasant memory has a large close bright image, make it smaller and notice what happens to your feeling. Return it to original size, then make it more distant and notice the effect. Return it, then dim it and notice again.
Test adjustments in both directions. Make the image larger as well as smaller. Move it closer as well as farther. Often one direction reduces intensity while the other increases it. Discovering which direction serves you reveals how to work with that quality therapeutically.
The somatic feedback is immediate. As you adjust visual qualities, you’ll feel your emotional response shift. As you adjust auditory qualities, the impact of what the voice says changes. As you adjust kinesthetic qualities, the intensity and meaning of sensation transforms. This direct experiential feedback teaches you how your system responds to structural adjustments.
Step 7: Work with Critical Voice
Most people have an inner critic that comments negatively. Use submodality work to transform its impact. First, map its complete structure: location, whose voice, speed, volume, pitch, tone. Then systematically adjust these qualities:
Move it from wherever it is to your center, or down and to the side (locations of less authority). If it’s someone else’s voice, change it to your own kind voice. Slow it way down. Lower the volume. Change the harsh tone to gentle. Try making the pitch ridiculously high or low.
Watch what happens to the message’s impact as you adjust its structure. Usually the critical voice loses its power, not because you argued with its content but because you changed the structure that gave it authority. The same words spoken kindly from your center feel supportive rather than attacking.
Step 8: Map Resourceful States
Think of times when you felt confident, creative, calm, joyful, or any other resource you value. Map the complete submodality structure of each resourceful state. These become your templates, the patterns your system uses to code positive experiences.
Notice similarities across resourceful states. Perhaps they all have images straight ahead rather than to the side, or all have warm sensations rather than cold, or all have voices that speak slowly rather than quickly. These commonalities reveal your system’s signature for resourcefulness.
Keep these templates accessible. When you need a resource, you can deliberately adjust your current submodalities to match the template, invoking that state intentionally rather than waiting for it to occur spontaneously.
Step 9: Practice Swish Patterns
The swish pattern is a classic NLP technique using submodalities for rapid change. Identify a problem state and its submodality structure. Identify a desired state and its structure. Then practice rapidly swishing from problem to desired structure:
Start with problem structure fully present. Then quickly whoosh it away (often shrinking it and sending it into the distance) while simultaneously bringing in the desired structure (often making it large, bright, and close). Make the swish very fast, almost instantaneous. Then blank your mind for a moment. Repeat five times quickly.
This pattern trains your brain to automatically transition from problem to resource. After practicing the swish, when the problem state begins to arise, your nervous system increasingly defaults to the resource state instead. The submodality shift becomes automatic.
Step 10: Integrate into Daily Life
Begin using submodality awareness throughout your day. When any experience arises that you want to understand or shift, quickly check its structure. Where is it? What qualities does it have? What could you adjust?
This real time application is where the practice becomes transformative. You’re no longer doing exercises; you’re living with refined awareness of how you structure experience, and you’re making micro adjustments constantly to keep yourself in resourceful states more often.
Over time, this awareness becomes second nature. You don’t think “I should check the submodalities”; you simply notice them automatically and adjust when useful. Your relationship with your own experience transforms from passive to active, from victim to creator.
▶️ VIDEO ABOUT NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY

This demonstration shows submodality mapping between two states. Pay attention to how the practitioner systematically compares the structures, identifying the critical differences that matter most. Watch for the moment when mapping those differences across creates a shift in the subject’s experience. The video illustrates that change doesn’t require hours of analysis; it requires precision in noticing and adjusting the right structural elements.
❓ FAQ ABOUT NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Question: What if I can’t notice any qualities at all? Everything just seems like “thinking” or “feeling” without specific structure.
Answer: This is common at first because most people have never been trained to observe experience at this level of detail. Start with the easiest, most obvious experiences. Wait for a moment of clear emotion or loud inner voice, then pause and ask just one question: “Where is this?” Location is usually the most accessible submodality to notice first. Once you can reliably locate experience in space, add one more quality, perhaps temperature for sensations or volume for voice. Build your observational capacity gradually rather than trying to notice everything at once. It’s like learning to distinguish flavors in wine; at first you just taste “wine,” but with practice you begin noticing specific notes and qualities. Your brain can learn this discrimination with patience and repeated practice. If difficulty persists, work with a skilled practitioner who can help you calibrate your observations through feedback.
Question: I notice the qualities but nothing happens when I adjust them. Am I doing it wrong?
Answer: Several possibilities here. First, you might be adjusting non-critical submodalities. Not all qualities matter equally; find the ones that have the most impact for you. Second, you might not be adjusting them far enough. If you make an image slightly smaller and nothing changes, try making it much smaller or much farther away. Third, you might need to adjust multiple qualities together rather than one at a time, especially if your system links them. Fourth, you might be too invested in the content to let structure changes affect you. Try this with neutral or mildly pleasant experiences first to build confidence that submodality work actually works. Finally, some experiences are protected by your system for good reasons and won’t shift easily; respect that and work with more accessible material first.
Question: Can changing submodalities harm me or make things worse?
Answer: Submodality work is generally safe when working with mild to moderate experiences, but there are important cautions. Don’t work with severely traumatic memories without professional support; intensifying them by accident could be retraumatizing. Be careful with phobias and panic; these need specific protocols that prevent increasing the fear. Some experiences are meant to be unpleasant; dulling down pain signals indiscriminately could cause you to ignore your body’s important warnings. The guideline is to start with low stakes material, respect your limits, and if something feels wrong or too intense, stop and seek professional help. Most negative effects come from rushing or forcing; if you work gradually and respectfully with your system, submodality adjustments generally feel like relief and increased choice rather than harm.
Question: Why do the qualities change on their own sometimes? I’ll map something and later it’s different.
Answer: This is normal and actually valuable information. Submodalities aren’t fixed; they’re the constantly updating structure your nervous system uses to code meaning. As your relationship with an experience changes, its submodalities naturally shift to reflect the new meaning. If you’re working through grief, for instance, the submodalities of memories of your lost loved one will evolve over time. The images might gradually become smaller and more distant, the sounds might soften, the sharp pain might transform to gentle warmth. These spontaneous shifts show that your system is processing and integrating naturally. You can also deliberately adjust qualities and find that they stay in the new structure if it’s congruent with your growth. If you adjust them but they keep reverting, your system might be indicating that it’s not ready for that change yet, or that the new structure doesn’t fit your current understanding.
Question: Are there “correct” submodalities for different experiences?
Answer: No, submodality organization is highly individual. One person’s confidence might be coded as large bright images straight ahead, while another person’s confidence is small clear images to the right. What matters isn’t matching some universal template but discovering your own system’s organization. That said, there are some common patterns: most people code things that feel far away as being farther in space; most people experience positive states with more brightness and color than negative ones; most people give authority to voices that come from above and behind. But these are tendencies, not rules. Your task is to map your unique patterns and work with them, not to force your experience into someone else’s structure.
Question: How do submodalities relate to the content of what I’m thinking or feeling?
Answer: This is a crucial question that reveals the power of this approach. Content is what you’re experiencing: the words the voice says, the memory you’re recalling, the emotion you’re feeling. Structure is how you’re experiencing it: the sensory qualities that organize the content. Traditional approaches work almost exclusively with content: talking about why you feel anxious, analyzing the origins of your critical voice, understanding the meaning of your memories. Submodality work addresses structure instead. You can leave the content completely unchanged and transform its impact by adjusting its structure. This is why submodality interventions can create rapid change that content based approaches take much longer to achieve. The content carries one level of meaning; the structure carries another, often more fundamental level. When you adjust structure, meaning shifts even without changing content.
Question: Can I use this to manipulate or trick myself into feeling things that aren’t true?
Answer: This is an important ethical question. Yes, you can use submodality work to intensify or diminish reactions in ways that might not serve you long term. You could dull down your body’s warning signals about a toxic relationship, or intensify attraction to someone unhealthy. The safeguard is intention and wisdom. Use submodality work to increase your choice and resourcefulness, not to override your genuine knowing. If your body is telling you something important through uncomfortable sensations, explore what the message is before just adjusting the volume down. If a voice is critical but actually helping you grow, clarify its message before silencing it. The purpose isn’t to feel good regardless of reality but to structure your experience in ways that serve your growth and authentic path. Your inner wisdom will generally let you know if you’re using these tools well or misusing them.
Question: How long does it take to develop reliable skill in noticing and adjusting submodalities?
Answer: This varies widely. Some people have natural awareness of sensory specificity and pick it up quickly, noticing and adjusting effectively within days. Others need weeks or months of consistent practice to develop clear perception of subtle qualities. Most people fall somewhere in between, gaining useful skill within several weeks but continuing to refine their capacity for years. What accelerates learning is regular practice, ideally daily, even if brief. Noticing submodalities of multiple experiences each day builds the neural pathways more effectively than occasional long practice sessions. Working with a skilled practitioner who can give you feedback on your observations also speeds learning significantly. The investment is worthwhile; this is a skill that serves you for life, giving you precision in working with your own experience that few people ever develop.
🧑🦲 AXEL MAGNUS’S EXPERIENCE WITH NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
The voice that penetrated through my crown and exited through my feet I can still feel the exact quality of it decades later. It wasn’t just words, though the word was clear. It was a full body transmission, a command that bypassed my conscious mind entirely and moved my body before thought could form.
In the years after trauma in 1992, as I learned to work with these experiences intentionally, I became obsessed with noticing exactly how the voice manifested. Where did it originate? From above, penetrating downward, always with directionality and force. What was its speed? Instantaneous in one sense, but also with duration, like a wave moving through me. What was its quality? Absolutely certain, allowing no doubt, carrying authority that superseded my own will.
I discovered that other voices had entirely different qualities. The worried chattering voice that filled my head most of the time came from just behind my eyes, spoke rapidly in my own voice with a questioning tone. The critical voice that had haunted me since childhood spoke from above and behind my left shoulder in my father’s tone, harsh and judgmental. These voices I could modulate, speed up, slow down, move around. But that other voice, the one that knew things, that one was different.
I began mapping the submodalities of different experiences systematically. When I felt fear, where was it? Cold tightness in my solar plexus, moving downward, sharp edged, about the size of a grapefruit. When I felt excitement, where was it? Warm expansion in my chest, moving upward and outward, soft edged, filling my whole torso. The two feelings that I had always confused, anxiety and excitement, turned out to have remarkably similar activation levels but opposite directional movements and temperatures.
This discovery changed everything. I realized I could distinguish between states that seemed identical by paying attention to their structural qualities. I could tell the difference between authentic inner voice and fear masquerading as wisdom by checking the location and quality. Fear spoke from multiple scattered locations with urgent rapidity. True knowing spoke from my center or from above with calm certainty.
I practiced adjusting submodalities deliberately. I would take a memory that still carried emotional charge and experiment with its structure. Making it smaller, more distant, dimmer. The emotional impact would diminish proportionally. Then I would reverse the adjustments, bringing it closer, larger, brighter, and feel the emotion intensify. This demonstrated beyond doubt that the structure shaped the meaning as much as the content did.
The most transformative work came with my father’s critical voice. For decades it had spoken from above and behind, harsh and loud and fast, telling me I wasn’t enough, I was doing it wrong, I would fail. I had spent years analyzing this voice, understanding its origins, recognizing that it was unfair. None of that reduced its power.
Then I tried something simple: I moved it. I picked it up from where it lived above and behind me and moved it down to my feet. Instantly its authority evaporated. The same words spoken from my feet sounded absurd rather than threatening. I experimented further. I slowed the voice way down, made it speak at half speed. The urgency disappeared. I changed whose voice it was, from my father’s harsh tone to my own kind voice. The criticism transformed into encouragement.
This wasn’t denial or suppression. The voice could still speak the same words, could still point out genuine areas for growth. But by changing its structural qualities, I stripped away the toxic overlay of shame and fear that had made it destructive rather than helpful. The information could remain; the wounding could dissolve.
I discovered that the sensed presences I experienced also had specific qualities. The presence on my left was cool, still, observing. The presence that sometimes appeared ahead and above was warm, moving slightly, engaging. These qualities helped me understand what each presence was communicating. The cool still presence offered objective perspective. The warm moving presence offered encouragement and connection.
Working with clients over the years, I’ve seen how individual submodality patterns are. One person’s confidence is large bright images straight ahead; another’s is small clear images to the side. One person’s calm is stillness and cooling; another’s is gentle movement and warmth. There’s no universal code, only each person’s unique way of structuring meaning.
But there are patterns. Most people I work with give authority to voices that come from above and behind, the position parents and teachers occupied when we were children receiving instruction and correction. Most people experience stuck states as having heavy downward movement, while resourceful states have lightness and upward or expanding movement. Most people code things they believe as having different visual qualities than things they doubt, usually brighter, clearer, more associated.
The beauty of submodality work is its precision and speed. I can help someone transform a limiting belief in twenty minutes by mapping its structure and the structure of something they already know is true, then mapping the first onto the second. I can help someone release a phobic response in a session by working with the visual and kinesthetic submodalities in specific ways. This isn’t magic; it’s working with the actual structure of how the nervous system codes experience.
I’ve also learned the limitations. Some experiences resist structural change because the system isn’t ready yet, because the pattern serves an important protective function, or because the person needs to process content alongside structure. Submodality work is powerful but not omnipotent. It’s one tool among many, tremendously effective for certain applications, less appropriate for others.
What continues to fascinate me is how much of my experience I can tune, almost like adjusting the levels on a sound mixing board. Too much anxiety? Lower the volume and slow the speed of the worried voice. Not enough motivation? Brighten and enlarge the images of desired outcomes. Stuck in rumination? Move the repetitive thoughts from center stage to peripheral awareness. This isn’t controlling experience in the sense of forcing it to be what it’s not; it’s organizing experience in ways that serve growth rather than limiting it.
I still map new experiences regularly. Last week I noticed a feeling of resistance to a project I needed to complete. I checked its submodalities: heavy dark mass in my upper chest, pressing inward, cold, rough textured. I experimented with adjustments. Warming it shifted nothing. Lightening it slightly reduced the resistance but felt inauthentic, like I was overriding a genuine signal. So I stayed curious: what was this resistance trying to tell me?
I realized the resistance carried information: this project, as I had conceived it, wasn’t aligned with my authentic purpose. The submodality structure was my system’s way of signaling misalignment. Instead of just dissolving the resistance, I needed to listen to it, understand its message, and adjust the project itself. When I modified my approach to better match my values, the resistance transformed on its own. The heavy dark mass became a warm light expansion, my body’s way of saying “yes, this is right.”
This is the deeper teaching of submodality work. It’s not just a technology for feeling better regardless of circumstances. It’s a language for understanding the messages your nervous system constantly sends. Sometimes the work is adjusting the structure to access resources. Sometimes the work is honoring the structure as information about what needs to change externally, not just internally.
After thirty years of this practice, I notice submodalities automatically. I don’t think “I should check the qualities”; I simply perceive them as part of how I experience anything. A voice speaks and I simultaneously register its location, tone, speed. An emotion arises and I automatically sense its location, temperature, movement. This refined perception has become my native way of experiencing.
The gift is choice. I’m not at the mercy of experience that seems solid and unchangeable. I see the structure, and structure can be adjusted. This doesn’t mean I live in some blissed out state with no challenges. It means I have tools to work with challenges skillfully, to distinguish signal from noise, to resource myself when needed, to honor authentic guidance when it arrives.
The voice that saved me from the bicycle spoke in a specific way. I’ve learned to recognize that signature, that particular quality of penetrating knowing. When it speaks now, I listen. And when other voices speak, I check their qualities to understand what they are and whether they serve me. This discernment, built on precise observation of sensory structure, is one of the most valuable skills I’ve ever developed.
🕳️ THE LIMITATIONS OR UNCERTAINTIES IN NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
Not All Experiences Are Equally Accessible:
Some internal experiences are clearer and easier to observe than others. Strong emotions and loud inner voices are relatively easy to map; subtle states and fleeting impressions can be difficult to catch before they shift. Some people naturally have clearer internal imagery or more vivid kinesthetic awareness, making certain submodalities easier to notice. If you find particular modalities difficult to access, don’t force it. Work with what you can perceive clearly and build capacity gradually.
Individual Differences Are Vast:
What works for one person may not work for another because submodality organization is unique to each nervous system. A technique that rapidly transforms anxiety for someone whose anxiety is visually coded might be ineffective for someone whose anxiety is primarily kinesthetic. Books and courses often present protocols as if they work universally, but effective application requires adapting to individual patterns. This means you need to discover your own organization rather than assuming you match published examples.
Can Become Intellectualized or Mechanical:
There’s a risk of using submodality work as a mental exercise divorced from genuine felt experience. Thinking about adjusting qualities is different from actually sensing and shifting them somatically. Some people collect elaborate maps of their submodalities without the maps creating any actual change because they’re working conceptually rather than experientially. The work must remain grounded in direct sensory awareness and genuine shifts in felt experience, not just interesting observations about your internal structure.
Some Patterns Serve Important Functions:
Not every limiting pattern should be immediately dismantled. Sometimes anxiety is signaling genuine danger. Sometimes critical voices are protecting you from repeating mistakes. Sometimes heavy emotions need to be fully felt rather than quickly adjusted away. Before changing submodalities, understand what purpose the current structure might serve. Respect your system’s wisdom; it organized experience this way for reasons. Explore those reasons before overriding them.
Requires Honesty and Self Awareness:
Effective submodality work depends on accurate observation, which requires honesty about what you actually experience rather than what you think you should experience or what would sound impressive. Some people report elaborate submodality structures that sound good but aren’t actually accurate to their experience. This self deception undermines the work. You must be willing to observe neutrally, report accurately, and work with what is rather than what you wish were true.
Can Be Misused to Override Genuine Signals:
The power to adjust your internal experience can be used to silence important messages from your body and psyche. Someone could learn to dull down pain signals that indicate serious illness, or adjust away guilt that should prompt behavior change, or intensify attraction to inappropriate partners. The ethics of submodality work require using it to increase authentic alignment and growth, not to facilitate denial or harmful choices. Your responsibility is to distinguish between adjustments that serve your genuine wellbeing and ones that simply make you feel better in ways that will create problems later.
Severe Trauma Requires Professional Support:
While submodality work can be powerful for healing, working with severe trauma without proper training and support can be dangerous. Intense traumatic memories can overwhelm you if intensified accidentally. Dissociation patterns that protect you from unbearable experience shouldn’t be casually dismantled. If you have significant trauma history, work with qualified trauma therapists who understand both content and structure based approaches and can guide the work safely.
Results Aren’t Always Permanent:
Sometimes submodality changes stick immediately and permanently. Other times they last briefly before reverting to the original structure. Sometimes they stick but then shift again as circumstances change or new learning occurs. Permanent change often requires repeated practice, addressing multiple related patterns, or working with both structure and content. Don’t expect one submodality adjustment to permanently solve complex long standing patterns, though it can certainly provide relief and increased choice.
Not a Complete Approach:
Submodality work is powerful but not comprehensive. It doesn’t address social contexts, systemic injustices, practical life circumstances, or relationship dynamics except as they’re represented internally. Someone in an abusive relationship might be able to adjust their internal response to abuse, but that doesn’t solve the external problem of actually being abused. Submodality work should be part of a larger approach that includes addressing external realities, not a substitute for needed life changes.
Can Become Compulsive:
Some people discover submodality work and become compulsively focused on constantly adjusting their experience, never allowing themselves to simply be with what is. This hypervigilant tweaking can be a form of control that prevents natural processing and integration. Balance is needed: know how to adjust when useful, but also know when to accept and be with experience as it is.
✏️ CONCLUSION
Your experience is not monolithic but structured, built from specific sensory qualities that organize meaning. When you develop the capacity to notice these qualities with precision, you gain access to levers for change more powerful than years of talking about problems or trying to think differently. The critical voice loses its authority when you recognize it comes from above and behind in your father’s harsh tone and you move it to your center in your own kind voice. The anxiety transforms when you notice it’s cold and tight and moving downward and you warm it, loosen it, shift its direction.
This work requires patience and practice. At first, noticing specific qualities feels awkward and artificial. Your attention may drift back to content, to what the voice says rather than how and from where it speaks, to what the emotion means rather than its temperature and texture and movement. But persist, because precision in observation is the foundation for everything else. You cannot adjust what you cannot perceive clearly.
As your sensitivity develops, submodality awareness becomes natural, automatic, a dimension of experience you can’t help but notice. This refined perception gives you choice where you once felt stuck, agency where you felt victimized by your own mind and emotions. You discover that you are not your experience but the context in which experience arises, and that context includes the power to organize experience in ways that serve your growth.
Begin simply. Choose one quality to notice consistently for a week. Just location, nothing more. Once location becomes automatic, add another quality. Build your observational capacity gradually and patiently, trusting that each layer of refinement increases your ability to work with your experience skillfully. The specific sensory qualities you’re learning to notice are the language your nervous system speaks. Learn that language, and transformation becomes possible in ways you haven’t yet imagined.
📚 REFERENCES
- George Lakoff & Mark Johnson, 1980; Metaphors We Live By
- Steve & Connirae Andreas, 1987; Change Your Mind and Keep the Change: Advanced NLP Submodalities Interventions
- Julian Jaynes, 1976; The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind
- Andreas, S. (2002). Transforming yourself: Becoming who you want to be. Real People Press.
- Connirae Andreas & Steve Andreas, 1989; Heart of the Mind: Engaging Your Inner Power to Change with Neuro-Linguistic Programming
- Connirae Andreas & Tamara Andreas; 1994; Core Transformation: Reaching the Wellspring Within
- video DVD Transforming Yourself Complete 3 day Training with Steve Andreas
- The Wholeness Work
- Core Transformation
- Bandler, R., & MacDonald, W. (1988). An Insider’s Guide to Sub-Modalities
- Dilts, R. (1990). Changing Belief Systems with NLP
- Andreas, S., & Andreas, C. (1994). The Perception of Time: NLP and the Kinesthetic Internal Representations of Time
- James, T. (2007). The Secret of Creating Your Future
- Bodenhamer, B., & Hall, L. M. (1999). The User’s Manual for the Brain: The Complete Manual for Neuro-Linguistic Programming Practitioner Certification
- Hall, L. M. (2000). Sourcebook of Magic: A Comprehensive Guide to NLP Change Patterns
🗣️ JOKES ABOUT NOTICING VOICE AND SENSATION QUALITY
- My therapist asked me where I feel anxiety. I said “everywhere.” She said “be more specific.” I said “everywhere, but slightly to the left.”
- I’ve become so good at noticing submodalities that I can now describe my procrastination in six different sensory dimensions. Still procrastinating though.
- The critical voice in my head used to come from above and behind. Now it comes from down and to the right. Much easier to ignore from there.
- I told my friend I could feel the difference between warm expansion and cold contraction. He said “that’s called weather.”
- My inner voice speaks in Comic Sans. No wonder I never took it seriously.
🎨 METAPHORS FOR SUBMODALITIES AND QUALITY
- Submodalities are like the mixing board for a song: the melody stays the same, but adjusting volume, bass, treble, and balance completely changes how it feels.
- Your inner experience is like a photograph: the content is what’s in the picture, but the brightness, contrast, color saturation, and distance from your eye determine how it impacts you.
- Noticing sensory qualities is like being a wine taster: where others just taste “wine,” you detect specific notes, textures, temperatures, and aftertastes.
- Your critical voice is like a radio station: you can’t change what it’s broadcasting, but you can adjust the volume, change the station’s location, or switch to a different frequency entirely.
- Body sensations are like the weather inside you: you can’t control whether it’s sunny or stormy, but you can track the temperature, wind speed, and direction with precision.
- Adjusting submodalities is like being a film editor: you can zoom in or out, adjust brightness and color, speed things up or slow them down, completely changing the emotional impact of the same scene.
- Inner voice location is like speaker placement in a sound system: the same message sounds authoritative from above, intimate from your center, and easy to dismiss from down by your feet.
🎬 MOVIES ABOUT PERCEPTION AND AWARENESS
- Inception (2010) - Explores layers of experience and the structure of mental reality
- Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) - Memory structure and emotional encoding
- Inside Out (2015) - Visualization of internal experience and emotional qualities
- The Matrix (1999) - Reality as constructed experience with malleable qualities
📺 TV SHOWS ABOUT PERCEPTION AND AWARENESS
- Legion (2017-2019) - Mental experience given visual structure and form
- Maniac (2018) - Internal worlds with distinct sensory qualities
- Westworld (2016-2022) - Memory, perception, and the construction of experience
🎭 DOCUMENTARIES ABOUT PERCEPTION AND AWARENESS
- What the Bleep Do We Know!? (2004) - Explores perception and reality construction
- The Brain with David Eagleman (2015) - How the brain constructs sensory experience
- Through the Wormhole: Can We Perceive Eleventh Dimensions? (2012) - Perception beyond ordinary awareness
📚 NOVELS ABOUT PERCEPTION AND AWARENESS
- The Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le Guin - Different modes of perceiving reality
- Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes - Shifts in perceptual capacity and awareness
- Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut - Non-linear time perception and memory structure
- The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner - Multiple perspectives and sensory experience